Archive for June, 2009

My talented friend and writing buddy, Peter Ball (author of the rapidly becoming notorious novella Horn) and I have been conducting Write Club for nigh on two months now. This started out as a result of me whinging about my writer’s block and Pete regaling me with the tale of how Holly Black (Spiderwick Chronicles) and Kelly Link (Magic for Beginners, Stranger Things Happen, Pretty Monsters) get together and sit in a cafe and just write (and presumably drink coffee). (Man, I hope that story’s true or my world is built on a marshmallowy foundation.) The idea is a support group of one to keep you on track putting down new words and to stop your inner editor from getting a hold of you.

So, once a week, we have Write Club in one of our living rooms – although I think my house may now be about to be deemed unsuitable as it has wireless, which defeats the purpose – we brew copious amounts of coffee, eat an amount of choclit roughly equivalent to the weight of a small child, and just write. If one of us stops writing for longer than 60 seconds, the other person must yell ‘WRITE!’ at an annoyingly loud volume. It’s like a jumpstart for writers – the literary equivalent of an electric shock. In a quiet room, with only the light tapping of keys, it can be quite effective – and messy if you’re in the middle of sipping your coffee.

But the point is: it works. I’ve managed to get the first draft of my novel done, to get a novella started, and am now on the rewrite of the first draft of said-same novel. Pete’s hit 60k on his novel and can now see the light at the end of the train tunnel.

Write Club works. I highly recommend it. It works best in a group of two or three – any more than that and the temptation to talk becomes a bit too strong – as Clive Barker said in Weaveworld ‘After three, the multitude’.

Next, Project Mayhem, writer-style.


Read Full Post »

They lured me here with promises of marriage. The best of men, the greatest of warriors was to be my husband.

We left my brother and sisters behind, taking the lightest chariot, the fastest horses, my mother and I. Chrysothemis and Elektra wept, covering their face with grief at our parting, but I saw their eyes, rich and dark with envy. My sisters swallowed down the bitter aloes of my marriage to Achilles, of my being chosen for such an honour.


Read Full Post »

Peter Ball’s novella Horn, from punching-above-its-weight indie Twelfth Planet Press, got reviewed by the uber-redoutable (yes, ‘redoubtable’ is my word’o’th’month) Jeff VanderMeer over at Ecstatic Days http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2009/06/24/first-and-short-horn-by-peter-m-ball/#more-5059.

 Twelfth Planet Press http://twelfthplanetpress.wordpress.com/

Read Full Post »


The lovely Rosalie Parker at Tartarus Press has given my loooooong short story ‘Sister, Sister’ a home in Strange Tales III. She also took ‘Sourdough’ from me for Strange Tales II. The first Strange Tales won a World Fantasy award as I recall. Tartarus produce beautiful books – hard covers, dust jackets, nice paper and lil silk ribbons to mark pages – go here to see more http://www.tartaruspress.com/index.htm *bibliophile drool*.

Read Full Post »

Sometimes when I have a thought it dies of loneliness. Just like when I posted Q. Is the Publisher Always Right? some time ago. So, calling this ‘Part Deux’ may be over-stating things a bit seeing as how there wasn’t really much to the first post. *sigh*

What originally started me on the train of thought was contemplating the tension between a writer writing what s/he wants/needs to write, and what a publisher knows/feels will actually sell. I love writing – I write because I can’t not write (my head will explode) – but in writing I also want to be a self-supporting writer. The whole point, for me at least, is to sell books (well, once I finish writing one – I have a finishing coach who yells at me ‘Finish it!’ over breakfast once a fortnight). I want to be able to make a living as a writer. This is bloody difficult and the subject of a future blog post.

But I digress. Once you’ve written your novel, had it edited, developed, proofread, and schlepped around to publishers and agents, if you’re really, really lucky you might just find a publisher who wants to put your book out there. You need to be able to work with this person: you need to be able to take advice, constructive criticism and to recognize that in some cases at least your publisher is going to know the best way to go about publishing you. This may mean you are asked to re-write something, to change something else, to restructure a part of the book, to lose a character. As a newbie author, do you then (a) abuse your publisher, (b) explain to them how you think the publishing industry works, or (c) say ‘Yes, sir/ma’am, may I please have another?

As an emerging author, you need to understand the BOP – balance of power. When a publisher – a traditional publisher – signs you up, they take a financial risk. Basically, they are laying a bet that your book will sell. The bet they outlay is the advance to you. Whether you like the idea or not, you are an investment for the publisher. You have a symbiotic relationship: they rely on you to produce work they can sell; you rely on them to continue placing bets on you. If one member of the team stops working, then everything grinds to a halt.

When you submit a manuscript to a publisher as a newbie author, please realize that chances are you have very little power in this situation (unless of course you know you’ve produced the new Harry Potter/Twilight or you’ve managed to make zombies sexy – a fortune awaits s/he who can do that). You are not, and please please please remember this, doing a publisher a favour by allowing them the opportunity to publish your book. You are the supplicant. Follow the submission guidelines – don’t tell the publisher why the rules don’t apply to you – it is unwise in the extreme.

If a publisher signs you up, then you need to remember that you have a business relationship with your publisher. You write the books; the publisher publishes them; they get sold; you and your publisher stay in business. Quid pro quo. In recent weeks I’ve heard a new author claim not to care if only three copies of his book were sold – because at least those three would ‘start a dialogue’. Indeed, the dialogue will be with your publisher and it will start with the words ‘We need to talk’. The same author also claimed that the prize money attached to a literary award recently won ‘meant nothing and didn’t even factor in to entering the competition’. (Oh, really? Then please allow me to take that inconvenient and unimportant $20K off your hands!)

One of my friends in publishing is currently tearing her hair out because several authors are not quite understanding the BOP. They are not big name authors, they are not literary geniuses, they are not selling books by the truckload and yet these individuals insist on explaining to an experienced publisher ‘how the publishing and writing industries work’. Ah-ha.

If you really disagree with what’s being suggested, then try to find a middle path that makes changes both you and the publisher can live with – artistic compromise in the interest of a symbiotic relationship. When you consider the changes you’re being asked to make, don’t let ‘offense’ be your first port of call. ‘How dare someone ask me to change my work!!’ There are no golden words. No one is perfect. And the price of a good publisher/editor is beyond rubies. Your publisher can be your greatest ally – they know the business, they can be an excellent guide for your career.

Is there ever a time when the BOP changes? Yes, when you become Neil Gaiman and/or J K Rowling.

Is the publisher ever not right? Well, yes, sometimes for sure. If your publisher seems to be bringing the crazy to the party then maybe you do need to reconsider the relationship. But until the crazy makes itself known, try to play nice and be reasonable. And don’t you be the one to bring the crazy.

Read Full Post »

Tonight I Am …

… writing racing with Meg Vann’s superb AWMonline team. Tonight’s cap’n is the wonderful Trent Jamieson.


Read Full Post »

The exceedingly redoutable Meg Vann interviews John Tranter at Speakeasy http://blog.awmonline.com.au/2009/06/23/lit-mag-6-next-time-youll-have-to-kill-more-chickens/

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »